Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL
Date: 2002-03-22 19:12:02
Message-ID: 1016824322.22862.6.camel@jiro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 14:00, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> BTW, is NULLABLE so ugly that no one wanted to comment on it? It _is_
> an sql92 reserved keyword, and it's actual english grammar.

FWIW, I liked it the best of all the solutions that have been proposed
so far.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-03-22 19:12:40 Re: Use of PG_BINARY_R and "r"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-03-22 19:07:54 Re: SET NULL / SET NOT NULL