Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date: 2007-04-09 17:17:11
Message-ID: 29490.1176139031@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> I think I'll be able to set up my HP-UX 11.11 box here, as soon as it gets
> fixed, and assuming either the bundled compiler will work or I can get
> GCC on it.

If the bundled compiler is still the same non-ANSI-C weakling that was
bundled in HPUX 10, there's no chance. It would be great to have a
buildfarm member using HP's real ANSI-spec C compiler though.
I still do a lot of my own development on HPUX 10 + gcc, so I'm not
particularly worried about lack of that combination in the buildfarm.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2007-04-09 18:58:20 Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-04-09 16:58:12 PGPROCs of autovac workers (was Re: [PATCHES] autovacuum multiworkers, patch 5)