Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
Date: 2007-04-09 18:58:20
Message-ID: 20070409135747.H17853@thebighonker.lerctr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:

> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
>> I think I'll be able to set up my HP-UX 11.11 box here, as soon as it gets
>> fixed, and assuming either the bundled compiler will work or I can get
>> GCC on it.
>
> If the bundled compiler is still the same non-ANSI-C weakling that was
> bundled in HPUX 10, there's no chance. It would be great to have a
> buildfarm member using HP's real ANSI-spec C compiler though.
> I still do a lot of my own development on HPUX 10 + gcc, so I'm not
> particularly worried about lack of that combination in the buildfarm.

Looks like we are a DSPP member, so I might be able to get the aCC bundle
for free, and if so, I'll set it up with that.

Thanks,
LER

>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-04-09 19:57:34 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of Complex Types
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-09 17:17:11 Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?