Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying

From: Mathieu Arnold <mat(at)mat(dot)cc>
To: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perpetuating the myth...annoying
Date: 2004-04-14 16:52:16
Message-ID: 2942923437.1081968736@andromede.faubourg.reaumur.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

+-le 05/04/2004 14:00 -0400, Dan Langille a dit :
| On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Jacob Hanson wrote:
|
|> http://www.oetrends.com/news.php?action=view_record&idnum=319
|>
|> Article discussing PHP5 says SQLite is "typically faster than MySQL,
|> significantly faster than PostgreSQL". While I don't doubt it's
|> faster at what it does (with it's small, focused feature-set), the
|> article perpuates the 'Postgres is slow' and 'MySQL is much faster
|> than Postgres' thinking that is no longer accurate.
|
| I can confirm that SQLite is faster than either MySQL or PostgreSQL when
| using Bacula. I'm working on improving the PostgreSQL.

On the Bacula side, I'm keeping sqlite because it's "one file", nothing to
restore beside that if (when) it (will) crashes.

--
Mathieu Arnold

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2004-04-14 19:17:03 Analysis/Overview of PostgreSQL and SQL2003
Previous Message Omar Miranda 2004-04-14 15:03:31 PostgreSQL CD based on Morphix