Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?
Date: 2014-05-21 20:37:46
Message-ID: 2916.1400704666@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Section 18.1.3 is named "18.1.3. Other Ways to Set Parameters" yet does not
> reference the ability to use "set_config(...)" to make changes to
> configuration parameters.

Hm, yeah, seems like an oversight.

Another thing I've never been terribly happy about is that pg_settings is
mentioned only in the next sub-section. Could we merge that sub-section
with 18.1.3?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G Johnston 2014-06-05 23:34:41 Some qualms with the current description of RegExp s,n,w modes.
Previous Message David G Johnston 2014-05-21 19:00:27 [9.3] Should we mention "set_config(...)" in 18.1.3 in Server Configuration?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Sibley 2014-05-21 23:25:58 Re: [PATCH] Add --ordered option to pg_dump
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-05-21 20:37:13 Re: pg_upgrade fails: Mismatch of relation OID in database 8.4 -> 9.3