Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Date: 2002-09-25 22:27:59
Message-ID: 28691.1032992879@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I already have a TODO item:
> * Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]
> I am unsure if it will be fixed in 7.3 or not. It is still on the open
> items list, and I think we have a general plan to fix it.

I got distracted and wasn't following the thread a few days ago about
the topic. Did people come to a consensus about how it should work?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Patrick Welche 2002-09-25 22:28:21 Re: Relation 0 does not exist
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-25 22:26:22 Re: Relation 0 does not exist