From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? |
Date: | 2002-09-25 22:21:49 |
Message-ID: | 200209252221.g8PMLn903474@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paesold wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> writes:
> > > I have come across a problem (bug?) with PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS.
> >
> > Hm. This seems to be SPI's version of the same definitional issue
> > we're contending with for status data returned from an interactive
> > query: SPI is currently set up to return the status of the last
> > querytree it executes, which is probably the wrong thing to do in the
> > presence of rule rewrites. But I'm hesitant to change SPI until we know
> > what we're going to do for interactive query status.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
>
> So this is not going to be fixed for 7.3 I suggest, no? Can you add the
> issue to the TODO list or can this thread be added to any appropriate TODO
> item?
I already have a TODO item:
* Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]
I am unsure if it will be fixed in 7.3 or not. It is still on the open
items list, and I think we have a general plan to fix it.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-25 22:26:22 | Re: Relation 0 does not exist |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-25 22:18:20 | Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel is broken |