Re: C vs. C++ contributions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub(at)richlava(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C vs. C++ contributions
Date: 2002-07-22 15:29:32
Message-ID: 28460.1027351772@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub(at)richlava(dot)com> writes:
> never any mention of C++ (libpq++ excepted). So, at a risk of stating
> the obvious (and I'm 99.99% sure I am), does backend code need to be
> submitted as C even if it's for an entirely NEW module?

Backend code must be C; we do not want to deal with C++ portability
issues.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Reina 2002-07-22 16:17:09 Re: Inheritance a burden?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-07-22 15:18:55 Re: Demo patch for DROP COLUMN