| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub(at)richlava(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C vs. C++ contributions |
| Date: | 2002-07-23 23:16:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200207232316.g6NNGTW10341@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc Lavergne <mlavergne-pub(at)richlava(dot)com> writes:
> > never any mention of C++ (libpq++ excepted). So, at a risk of stating
> > the obvious (and I'm 99.99% sure I am), does backend code need to be
> > submitted as C even if it's for an entirely NEW module?
>
> Backend code must be C; we do not want to deal with C++ portability
> issues.
Is it something that could be in /conrib?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2002-07-23 23:23:30 | Re: [PATCHES] prepareable statements |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-23 23:13:18 | Re: contrib/ltree for 7.2 or 7.3 ? |