Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-06 15:29:58
Message-ID: 27249.1054913398@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> 1) Are any additional changes expected for GUC.c before feature-freeze?

I'm still thinking of adding an am_superuser variable so that psql can
rely on the new ParameterStatus mechanism instead of explicit queries to
find out if you're superuser. But this would be a read-only variable
and so should not appear in postgresql.conf. Offhand I'm not aware of
any other proposed additions ... but something might turn up.

> 2) Are all of the new GUC.c variables for 7.4 already documented in the CVS
> docs?

They should be.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-06-06 15:33:04 Re: Wrong version of jdbc in 7.3.3 rpms
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-06 15:29:30 Re: Removing a user's password