Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Proposal to Re-Order Postgresql.Conf, part II
Date: 2003-06-05 15:23:47
Message-ID: 200306050823.47088.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Folks,

Last we talked (before the mail server went down) Tom had agreed in principle
to a re-ordering of postgresql.conf.sample and the "Run-Time Configuration"
docs page based on the attached ordering file.

I would like to make this happen before feature-freeze on June 15. To do
that, I need more info:

1) Are any additional changes expected for GUC.c before feature-freeze?

2) Are all of the new GUC.c variables for 7.4 already documented in the CVS
docs? If not, can the responsible parties send me descriptions so that I can
doc it?

3) Do people want me to take a stab at re-ordering GUC.c as well (that is,
Tom's idea of having the GUC.c ordering alphabetical within each variable
type), considering that I am not a C programmer?

4) Does anyone else have any comments on the proposed re-ordering?

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

Attachment Content-Type Size
re_order_conf text/plain 2.3 KB

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-06-05 15:25:05 UPDATE ... SET = DEFAULT
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-05 15:13:15 Re: Aggregates containing outer references don't work per