Re: Query question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Oleg Lebedev" <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query question
Date: 2002-10-04 20:52:34
Message-ID: 26674.1033764754@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Oleg Lebedev" <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org> writes:
> We have several tables each of which has an objectid field. These fields
> contain id values, 99% of which are in a 0 to 1,000,000 range and 1% of
> ids is randomly dispersed between 1,000,000 and 10,000,000,000 (these
> are the identity values we imported from SQL Server when moving to
> Postgres).
> We started a new project and want to use id values > 10,000,000,000 for
> it, so that they do not overlap with existing values.
> 1. Will this hit performance of queries involving this table?

Doesn't seem to be a big problem.

> 2. Can I help the planner by providing stats about ranges of values in
> this table? If yes then how?

Run ANALYZE ;-).

It might be worth pushing up the statistics target for the object ID
columns (see ALTER TABLE) to ensure that the planner has a pretty good
idea about the distribution of the IDs. Offhand I think the default
target (10) would be okay, but it'd be worth your while to experiment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dagoberto Torres 2002-10-04 21:01:42 sum function
Previous Message Cristóvão Dalla Costa 2002-10-04 20:49:55 LISTEN/NOTIFY