Re: re-reading SSL certificates during server reload

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: re-reading SSL certificates during server reload
Date: 2014-08-28 14:30:30
Message-ID: 25531.1409236230@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2014-08-28 10:20:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Having said that, there's a nearby thread about inventing a "SUBACKEND"
>> GUC category, and that's likely what we'd really want to use here, just
>> on the grounds that superusers would know better.

> What we really want is PGC_SIGHUP | PGC_BACKEND, right?

How you figure that? You *don't* want it to change at SIGHUP, at least
not in existing sessions. And the postmaster already thinks it should
reload PGC_BACKEND variables on SIGHUP.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-08-28 14:30:57 Re: pgsql: Allow units to be specified in relation option setting value.
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2014-08-28 14:29:18 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}