Re: Faster StrNCpy

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Faster StrNCpy
Date: 2006-10-03 14:24:11
Message-ID: 25275.1159885451@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc writes:
> ... It would come down to
> whether there was a security requirements that the last bytes
> were '\0' or not. I haven't seen anybody mention this as a
> requirement.

I think it is a requirement for namestrcpy (because the result might end
up on disk), but not elsewhere.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-03 14:34:06 tsearch2 error msg
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-10-03 14:20:19 Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey E. Koposov 2006-10-03 14:48:49 7.4, 8.0 branches @ itanium2 & icc
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-10-03 14:20:19 Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch