| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)sun(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch |
| Date: | 2006-10-03 14:20:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200610031620.19979.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Robert Treat wrote:
> Also should installation.sgml
> mention the issueswith building 32 vs 64 bit binaries
I'm not convinced there is an issue. dtrace will build the right
binaries by default. If you're messing with mixed environments *and*
delve into dtrace, you should probably be able to figure this out
yourself.
> and/or the issue with static functions?
The issue with that is simply that there is no released operating system
version for which the dtrace support works. I'm not sure what to do
about that.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-03 14:24:11 | Re: Faster StrNCpy |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-03 14:20:18 | Re: Faster StrNCpy |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-03 14:24:11 | Re: Faster StrNCpy |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-03 14:20:18 | Re: Faster StrNCpy |