Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)
Date: 2008-09-19 19:54:39
Message-ID: 24143.1221854079@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, why are all the conn parameters to events declared "const"? Isn't

> Because it looked prettier? Kidding. No idea, do you want me to change
> that or do you want to?

I'll fix it; it's hardly worth passing a patch around for.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gevik Babakhani 2008-09-19 19:54:53 PostgreSQL future ideas
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2008-09-19 19:52:49 Re: Do we really need a 7.4.22 release now?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-19 20:08:11 Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2008-09-19 19:50:38 Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs)