| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs) |
| Date: | 2008-09-19 19:50:38 |
| Message-ID: | 48D4028E.4060306@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, why are all the conn parameters to events declared "const"? Isn't
Because it looked prettier? Kidding. No idea, do you want me to change
that or do you want to?
> the reason for passing them in mainly to give the event proc a chance
> to issue queries?
>
>
Partly. You also want to give the eventproc a chance to issue a
PQinstanceData call, so it can copy stuff to the created result.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-09-19 19:52:49 | Re: Do we really need a 7.4.22 release now? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-19 19:43:58 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-19 19:54:39 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-19 19:43:58 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs) |