Re: pgsql-bugs list description needs updating.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-bugs list description needs updating.
Date: 2009-01-05 17:49:51
Message-ID: 23537.1231177791@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> pgsql-ports and pgsql-patches have been retired, so the text needs some
> updating.

Now that you mention it, there are mentions of both lists in the FAQ
as well as various places in the source code.

> I wonder if we need to make the distinction, though? ISTM we could
> handle compilation failures through pgsql-bugs just as well.

+1, let's just point it all to bugs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-01-05 18:41:21 Re: Missing bug-report numbers?
Previous Message Chander Ganesan 2009-01-05 15:24:14 Re: Missing bug-report numbers?