Re: Missing bug-report numbers?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missing bug-report numbers?
Date: 2009-01-05 18:41:21
Message-ID: 1231180881.17331.13.camel@jd-laptop.pragmaticzealot.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:30 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > There's somebody over in pgsql-bugs complaining about lack of response
> > to his bug report #4593. Well, no such bug number came by here, nor is
> > it in the archives. The adjacent bug numbers are also missing, and I
> > notice quite a few other gaps. What might be the cause of missing
> > bug numbers?
>
> Many are spam. Because we don't require a community registration to
> log bugs, we often got junk submissions from bots/idiots. Because the
> form sends the bugs as though they were from the submitter, most are
> then caught in the moderation queue where they get zapped. It's
> possible that a real one got lost that way of course.
>
> I'd prefer to require a community account, but others have wanted to
> keep the bug-reporting bar as low as possible in the past.

Perhaps it is time to re-open that discussion.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
--
PostgreSQL
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2009-01-05 22:27:59 Re: PostgreSQL GIT mirror status
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-05 17:49:51 Re: pgsql-bugs list description needs updating.