From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: More schema queries |
Date: | 2002-05-20 14:15:33 |
Message-ID: | 22220.1021904133@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> gcc -g -o postgres.exe -Wl,--base-file,postgres.base postgres.exp
> access/SUBSYS.o bootstrap/SUBSYS.o catalog/SUBSYS.o parser/SUBSYS.o
> commands/SUBSYS.o executor /SUBSYS.o lib/SUBSYS.o libpq/SUBSYS.o
> main/SUBSYS.o nodes/SUBSYS.o optimizer/SUBSYS.o port/SUBSYS.o
> postmaster/SUBSYS.o regex/SUBSYS.o rewrite/SUBSYS.o storage/ SUBSYS.o
> tcop/SUBSYS.o utils/SUBSYS.o -lcygipc -lcrypt
> access/SUBSYS.o(.text+0x13):heaptuple.c: undefined reference to `mcount'
On Unix it's necessary for the link step to include a -pg switch, just
like the compile steps. This is evidently not happening in the Windows
case.
In the Unix case, $(PROFILE) gets incorporated into $(LDFLAGS) in
src/Makefile.global, and then src/backend/Makefile uses $(LDFLAGS)
in the backend link rule (line 40 in current source). I don't see any
inclusion of flags at all in the Windows link rule at lines 48, 50.
Presumably these ought to at least mention $(PROFILE), and I wonder
whether they should not say $(LDFLAGS).
Please check it out and submit a patch...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-05-20 14:27:59 | Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-05-20 14:08:16 | Re: Unbounded (Possibly) Database Size Increase - Toasting |