On Sun, 2002-05-19 at 19:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz> writes:
> > However I could not get any size stabilization in the toasted case.
>
> Hmm. Which file(s) were growing, exactly? How many row updates is this
> run covering?
>
> I'd rather expect the toast indexes to grow given the lack-of-btree-
> collapse-logic issue.
Why sould the toast indexes grow significantly more than the primary key
of main table ?
> However, the rate of growth ought to be pretty
> tiny --- much less than the amount of data being pumped through, for
> sure.
----------
Hannu