| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
| Date: | 2003-03-14 17:15:06 |
| Message-ID: | 21985.1047662106@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> So, just to throw out a wild idea: If you're talking about making large
> changes to the on-the-wire protocol. Have you considered using an existing
> database protocol?
Yeah, I have. Didn't look promising --- there's no percentage unless
we're 100% compatible, which creates a lot of problems (eg, can't ship
type OIDs to frontend anymore).
What I actually looked into was RDA, but I doubt that TDS would be any
closer to our needs...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-14 17:23:04 | Re: Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-03-14 17:14:44 | My project: nested transactions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-03-14 17:23:04 | Re: Upgrading the backend's error-message infrastructure |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-03-14 17:07:30 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |