Re: AW: partial index

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: partial index
Date: 2001-08-06 15:25:58
Message-ID: 21781.997111558@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> Since bid is not in an index the evaluation of usability obviously
> should not be based on index ops ?

Feel free to reimplement the theorem-prover, taking special care to
be able to prove things about operators that you have zero information
about the semantics of.

The reason the prover works with btree-indexable operators is that
it can infer a lot of semantics from the index opclass relationships.
This has nothing to do with whether the index itself is btree or not,
let alone whether the variables used in the predicate are in the index.
It's just a way to do something useful within a reasonable amount of
code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Wheeler 2001-08-06 15:35:54 Re: user guide
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2001-08-06 15:05:13 RE: AW: partial index