Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on read-only slave?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on read-only slave?
Date: 2010-02-18 00:43:39
Message-ID: 20994.1266453819@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Our documentation says listen/notify will return an error if executed on
> the hot standby server:

> o LISTEN, UNLISTEN, NOTIFY since they currently write to system tables

> With the listen/notify system now implemented in memory, is this still
> true?

The explanation is wrong, but it's still disallowed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-18 00:52:09 Re: Need "SQLDA support for ECPG"
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-02-18 00:12:36 Re: Large object dumps vs older pg_restore