| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NOTIFY/LISTEN on read-only slave? |
| Date: | 2010-02-18 00:58:13 |
| Message-ID: | 201002180058.o1I0wDT21985@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Our documentation says listen/notify will return an error if executed on
> > the hot standby server:
>
> > o LISTEN, UNLISTEN, NOTIFY since they currently write to system tables
>
> > With the listen/notify system now implemented in memory, is this still
> > true?
>
> The explanation is wrong, but it's still disallowed.
Thanks, implemented detail removed, restriction retained.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Clemmons | 2010-02-18 01:04:12 | Michael Clemmons wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-02-18 00:52:09 | Re: Need "SQLDA support for ECPG" |