| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.4 open items list |
| Date: | 2009-04-02 14:46:13 |
| Message-ID: | 20865.1238683573@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> In this case, createdb - however, this particular case is of very
> minor impact to us. My gripe is more on the general issue of being
> potentially forced to add support for a new version and beta test
> tools in the same timeframe that PostgreSQL has for beta.
I hear you, but really the only way we could promise that would be to
have a period before beta of nothing happening in the core project while
tools authors do their thing. That doesn't seem productive. We're
trying to get some parallelism here, not serialize all the development
and testing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-04-02 14:47:46 | Re: 8.4 open items list |
| Previous Message | abdelhak benmohamed | 2009-04-02 14:44:30 | about hacking postgresql |