Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema
Date: 2006-05-17 16:08:07
Message-ID: 20707.1147882087@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> That seems like a very odd way to phrase that since just saying that the
> sets of column names are equivalent would be enough for that and all the
> extra words seem to only obscure the point.

As an example of clear well-written English, it certainly fails
miserably no matter which construction you put on it :-(.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Frost 2006-05-17 16:11:51 Re: does wal archiving block the current client connection?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-05-17 16:05:27 Re: Foreign key column reference ordering and information_schema