Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server
Date: 2015-03-02 20:12:36
Message-ID: 20150302201236.GF3291@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Stephen Frost wrote:

> Having a curated list of active PUGs (where "active" is at least one
> meeting every other month, in my view..) and links to information about
> them would be good, but mailing lists are not that.

Actually we do have a list, curated (mostly) by Jon Katz. What is wrong
with that? Is that not backing enough from the postgresql.org website
to PUGs?

http://www.postgresql.org/community/user-groups/

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2015-03-02 20:23:50 Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-03-02 20:08:38 Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server