Re: Remaining beta blockers

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remaining beta blockers
Date: 2013-05-03 16:26:43
Message-ID: 20130503162643.GK5933@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:10:14PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > I'm more concerned about moving information which really should be in
> > the system catalogs out into magic files on disk..
>
> Right. The whole thing is just a kluge, which I'm convinced we'll
> regret sooner or later --- probably sooner. I would much rather drop
> unlogged matviews for now and put scannability status into pg_class
> where it belongs.

Right. I think the big question is whether we can add crash recovery
system catalog writes in the time before beta, and whether we would need
that even if we remove unlogged table support.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-05-03 16:28:08 Re: Documentation epub format
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-05-03 16:19:27 Re: Remaining beta blockers