| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com, noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
| Date: | 2012-12-05 10:35:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20121205103507.GB8717@alap2 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 2012-12-05 19:06:55 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> So what status are we on? Are we going to release 9.2.2 as it is?
> Or withdraw current 9.2.2?
Releasing as-is sounds good. As Tom wrote upthread:
On 2012-12-04 21:27:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> This is not a regression because the pause logic is broken this same
> way since 9.1. So I no longer think that we need a rewrap.
Imo the bug isn't all that critical, it cause confusion but no data corruption
or such.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Branka Stancic | 2012-12-05 12:40:31 | pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2012-12-05 10:06:55 | Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2012-12-05 11:16:30 | Re: Review of Row Level Security |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-12-05 10:22:24 | Re: Dumping an Extension's Script |