Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay
Date: 2012-11-16 01:20:51
Message-ID: 20121116012051.GE5162@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Peter Geoghegan (peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> I am inclined to agree. I did attempt to use the instrumentation
> macros to have commit_delay set adaptively at runtime, which would
> have at least addressed this concern, but that just didn't work as
> well as this.

Setting it at run-time was actually my first thought on this. I'm
disappointed to hear that it didn't work out well.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-11-16 01:26:42 Re: Do we need so many hint bits?
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2012-11-16 00:42:57 Do we need so many hint bits?