Fix for pg_upgrade migrating pg_largeobject_metadata

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Fix for pg_upgrade migrating pg_largeobject_metadata
Date: 2011-01-06 02:28:23
Message-ID: 201101060228.p062SNT02902@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> That isn't going to work. At least not unless you start trying to force
> > >> roles to have the same OIDs in the new installation.
> >
> > > If so I can use the CREATE ROLE ... SYSID clause when doing a binary
> > > upgrade.
> >
> > Oh, I had forgotten we still had that wart in the grammar.
> > It doesn't actually work:
> >
> > else if (strcmp(defel->defname, "sysid") == 0)
> > {
> > ereport(NOTICE,
> > (errmsg("SYSID can no longer be specified")));
> > }
> >
> > Not sure if it's better to try to make that work again than to add
> > another hack in pg_upgrade_support. On the whole that's a keyword
> > I'd rather see us drop someday soon.
>
> OK, let me work on adding it to pg_upgrade_support. Glad you saw this.

I have fixed the bug by using pg_upgrade_support. It was a little
complicated because you need to install the pg_upgrade_support functions
in the super-user database so it is available when you create the users
in the first step of restoring the pg_dumpall file.

I am afraid we have to batckpatch this to fix to 9.0 for 9.0 to 9.0
upgrades. It does not apply when coming from pre-9.0 because there was
no pg_largeobject_metadata.

For testing I did this:

CREATE DATABASE lo;
\c lo
SELECT lo_import('/etc/motd');
\set loid `psql -qt -c 'select loid from pg_largeobject' lo`
CREATE ROLE user1;
CREATE ROLE user2;
-- force user2 to have a different user id on restore
DROP ROLE user1;
GRANT ALL ON LARGE OBJECT :loid TO user2;

The fixed version shows:

lo=> select * from pg_largeobject_metadata;
lomowner | lomacl
----------+------------------------------------------
10 | {postgres=rw/postgres,user2=rw/postgres}
(1 row)

In the broken version, 'user2' was a raw oid, obviously wrong.

Fortunately this was found during my testing and not reported as a bug
by a pg_upgrade user.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 14.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-01-06 02:32:40 Re: What is lo_insert?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-06 02:20:34 Re: What is lo_insert?