Re: Command Prompt 8.4.4 PRMs compiled with debug/assert enabled

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Max Williams <max(dot)williams(at)mflow(dot)com>, lacey(dot)powers(at)commandprompt(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Command Prompt 8.4.4 PRMs compiled with debug/assert enabled
Date: 2010-06-14 11:14:27
Message-ID: 201006141114.o5EBERC02420@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of jue jun 10 11:46:25 -0400 2010:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, the folks at commandprompt need to be told about this. Loudly.
> > > > > It's a serious packaging error.
> > > >
> > > > Just notified Lacey, the packager (not so loudly, though); she's working
> > > > on new packages, and apologizes for the inconvenience.
> > >
> > > [ Thread moved to hackers. 8.4.4 RPMs were built with debug flags. ]
> > >
> > > Uh, where are we on this? Has it been completed? How are people
> > > informed about this? Do we need to post to the announce email list?
> > > Does Yum just update them? How did this mistake happen? How many days
> > > did it take to detect the problem?
> > >
> > > Why has no news been posted here?
> > >
> > > https://public.commandprompt.com/projects/pgcore/news
> >
> > Why have I received no reply to this email? Do people think this is not
> > a serious issue? I know it is a weekend but the problem was identified
> > on Thursday, meaning there was a full workday for someone from
> > CommandPrompt to reply to the issue and report a status:
> >
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-06/msg00165.php
>
> [ Updated subject line.]
>
> I am on IM with Joshua Drake right now and am working to get answers to
> the questions above. He or I will report in the next few hours.
>
> FYI, only Command Prompt-produced RPMs are affected. Devrim's RPMs are
> not:
>
> http://yum.postgresqlrpms.org/

I have still seen no public report about this, 12 hours after talking to
Josh Drake on IM about it. :-(

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-06-14 11:15:33 Re: pg_dump(all) --quote-all-identifiers
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-06-14 11:12:40 Re: [v9.1] Add security hook on initialization of instance

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Elias Ghanem 2010-06-14 11:50:43 Dead lock
Previous Message David Jarvis 2010-06-14 11:10:41 Re: Analysis Function