Re: BUG #5416: int4inc() is wrong

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Regehr <regehr(at)cs(dot)utah(dot)edu>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5416: int4inc() is wrong
Date: 2010-05-31 20:35:39
Message-ID: 201005312035.o4VKZee24169@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Consider improving overflow detection
> > * http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4BC66A57.2030809@cs.utah.edu
>
> I did look at those at the time, and saw absolutely no reason to prefer
> them over what we do now.

OK, removed from TODO.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-31 20:36:50 Re: Bug in CREATE FUNCTION with character type (CONFIRMED BUG)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-31 20:30:13 Re: BUG #5416: int4inc() is wrong