Re: BUG #5416: int4inc() is wrong

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: John Regehr <regehr(at)cs(dot)utah(dot)edu>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5416: int4inc() is wrong
Date: 2010-05-31 20:30:13
Message-ID: 18872.1275337813@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Consider improving overflow detection
> * http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4BC66A57.2030809@cs.utah.edu

I did look at those at the time, and saw absolutely no reason to prefer
them over what we do now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-31 20:35:39 Re: BUG #5416: int4inc() is wrong
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-31 20:21:37 Re: BUG #5416: int4inc() is wrong