Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h
Date: 2010-05-23 15:50:00
Message-ID: 20100523155000.GD21875@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> Ugh. Moving that to c.h doesn't render it not junk code. (For one
> thing, it will not operate as intended if you haven't previously
> #included <limits.h>, which in fact is not included in c.h.)

Doh.

> If we need this we should do it properly with autoconf.

My autoconf foo is not very good, but once I finish a couple of other
things I'll take a shot at doing it that way.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matteo Beccati 2010-05-23 16:33:34 Re: Re: Mailing list archives (was Re: [HACKERS] mailing list archiver chewing patches)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-23 15:30:12 Re: mapping object names to role IDs