Re: pg_migrator

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator
Date: 2010-04-27 09:31:56
Message-ID: 201004270931.o3R9Vu811979@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> >> There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. Do
> >> we still want to do that?
>
> > I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for
> > keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the
> > 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time.
>
> I concur; it's about a month too late to propose this.

I am confused why it is late. We add to /contrib even during beta, and
I didn't bring it up earlier because I didn't want to be pushing my own
software. Was someone else supposed to suggest it a month ago?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-04-27 09:34:10 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-04-27 09:25:43 Re: Wierd quirk of HS/SR, probably not fixable