Re: pg_migrator

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator
Date: 2010-04-27 02:14:20
Message-ID: 19743.1272334460@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> There was talk of including pg_migrator in Postgres 9.0 in /contrib. Do
>> we still want to do that?

> I think you articulated some pretty good reasons previously for
> keeping it separate and, at any rate, I'm not eager to do it at the
> 11th hour without due consideration and adequate engineering time.

I concur; it's about a month too late to propose this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-27 02:35:22 Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-04-27 01:55:30 Re: pg_migrator