Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2010-02-23 14:34:26
Message-ID: 201002231434.o1NEYQO23304@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/2/23 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> >
> > Can someone work on a patch to implement the document changes suggested
> > below?
> >
>
> This patch is useless now. There are no this issue now, because we
> have integrated true SQL parser.

Great, thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-23 14:44:48 Re: function side effects
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-23 14:34:13 Re: tie user processes to postmaster was:(Re: [HACKERS] scheduler in core)