Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch
Date: 2010-02-23 23:48:44
Message-ID: 1266968924.6597.19.camel@jdavis-laptop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 09:34 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > 2010/2/23 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
> > >
> > > Can someone work on a patch to implement the document changes suggested
> > > below?
> > >
> >
> > This patch is useless now. There are no this issue now, because we
> > have integrated true SQL parser.
>
> Great, thanks.

I believe a documentation issue still exists here. The section on
calling functions (4.3) still says nothing about VARIADIC. Also, it's
not 100% clear to me where function overloading should go, but perhaps
it should be mentioned in that section as well.

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2010-02-23 23:54:03 Re: synchronous commit in dump
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-02-23 23:24:06 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move documentation of all recovery.conf option to a new chapter.