Re: Sourceforge PG release

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Date: 2009-07-07 14:50:15
Message-ID: 20090707145015.GC7694@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Also, Sourceforce now shows Postgres 8.4 on its main page so that issue
> is resolved too.

However I have a few questions.

- why is 7.3 still listed?
- why is the 8.4 branch listed last?
- why, in each branch, the oldest release is listed first?
- why are not all stable releases listed?
- why is there a "win32 installer" subpackage in the 8.2 branch,
pointing to an obviously-outdated package?
And lastly,
- why do we have this listing at all and not point people to our
downloads page which is obviously always up to date and complete?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-07 16:22:24 Re: [HACKERS] commitfest.postgresql.org
Previous Message Dave Page 2009-07-07 08:30:16 Re: Sourceforge PG release