| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: typedefs for indent |
| Date: | 2009-03-27 22:44:30 |
| Message-ID: | 200903272244.n2RMiUK10378@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > > Well, as you, I was hoping for a clear solution, and it seems we don't
> > > > have one. I think the false-positives problem is real and might make
> > > > the greater code coverage of the buildfarm worse than what we did for
> > > > 8.3.
> > >
> > > Huh? What false positive problem?
> >
> > typedefs listed on platforms that match identifiers in our code that are
> > _not_ typedefs.
>
> Does this actually happen anywhere?
No idea; it was more a theoretical issue to say that having more
typedefs is not necessarily a good thing; they should ideally be the
typedefs we use, and Windows adds a lot of typedefs we don't use.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-03-27 22:58:18 | Re: typedefs for indent |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-03-27 22:42:28 | Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets |