Re: typedefs for indent

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: typedefs for indent
Date: 2009-03-27 22:27:44
Message-ID: 20090327222744.GZ11993@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > Well, as you, I was hoping for a clear solution, and it seems we don't
> > > have one. I think the false-positives problem is real and might make
> > > the greater code coverage of the buildfarm worse than what we did for
> > > 8.3.
> >
> > Huh? What false positive problem?
>
> typedefs listed on platforms that match identifiers in our code that are
> _not_ typedefs.

Does this actually happen anywhere?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-27 22:40:00 Re: 8.4 release notes proof reading 1/2
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-27 22:06:22 Re: 8.4 open items list