Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date: 2009-01-08 17:50:57
Message-ID: 200901081750.n08HovL02334@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > People change their mind, or they forget the decision they took last
> > time and take the opposite one later. Tom said that he didn't see a
> > value in rst:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/27079.1219365411%40sss.pgh.pa.us
>
> Well, actually, I *still* don't see the value in being able to emit ReST
> --- nobody except D'Arcy has stated an interest in the feature. I'd
> feel better about it if there were more votes for it. But in any case

I think I counted 5-6 who wanted it, which seems sufficient from the
hackers list. Besides we didn't actually ask who wanted it but rather
discussed implementation details.

> I'm quite sure that ReST-except-it-breaks-on-various-special-characters
> is not up to our project's quality expectations.

Yep.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-01-08 17:54:54 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-01-08 17:46:34 Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql