| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
| Date: | 2009-01-08 17:24:24 |
| Message-ID: | 17745.1231435464@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> People change their mind, or they forget the decision they took last
> time and take the opposite one later. Tom said that he didn't see a
> value in rst:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/27079.1219365411%40sss.pgh.pa.us
Well, actually, I *still* don't see the value in being able to emit ReST
--- nobody except D'Arcy has stated an interest in the feature. I'd
feel better about it if there were more votes for it. But in any case
I'm quite sure that ReST-except-it-breaks-on-various-special-characters
is not up to our project's quality expectations.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2009-01-08 17:30:41 | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-01-08 17:08:06 | Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql |