Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Robert Hodges <robert(dot)hodges(at)continuent(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jens-Wolfhard Schicke <drahflow(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication
Date: 2008-08-13 16:55:19
Message-ID: 200808131655.m7DGtJq03708@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > I think doing the WAL streaming and allowing a read-only slave is
> > enough work to keep Simon busy for quite some time. I don't
> > understand why the logical issue is being discussed at this stage ---
> > let's get the other stuff done first.
>
> I'm not working on WAL streaming. My plans assume someone else is and
> I'll be as worried as you if the current answer is "nobody".

Oh, OK, good. I was unclear on that. NTT is working with EnterpriseDB
on the WAL steaming code to be released to the community.

> I expect to be involved in reviewing it fairly closely though...

Yes, of course.

> Other than that, my time is limited only by how much funding I have. Or
> put another way, the constraining factor is money, not available time.

That is good, I think. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-08-13 16:57:09 Re: temporary statistics option at initdb time
Previous Message Decibel! 2008-08-13 16:49:10 Re: SeqScan costs