Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, Robert Hodges <robert(dot)hodges(at)continuent(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jens-Wolfhard Schicke <drahflow(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transaction-controlled robustness for replication
Date: 2008-08-13 16:21:13
Message-ID: 1218644473.5343.368.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 11:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I think doing the WAL streaming and allowing a read-only slave is
> enough work to keep Simon busy for quite some time. I don't
> understand why the logical issue is being discussed at this stage ---
> let's get the other stuff done first.

I'm not working on WAL streaming. My plans assume someone else is and
I'll be as worried as you if the current answer is "nobody".

I expect to be involved in reviewing it fairly closely though...

Other than that, my time is limited only by how much funding I have. Or
put another way, the constraining factor is money, not available time.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tim Hawes 2008-08-13 16:35:36 Re: C Extension woes
Previous Message Jan Urbański 2008-08-13 16:18:29 Re: C Extension woes