| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Date: | 2008-06-06 15:50:54 |
| Message-ID: | 200806061750.55582.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Freitag, 6. Juni 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > - If we know better values, why don't we set them by default?
>
> The problem is: better for what? In particular, I'm uncomfortable with
> any changes in the direction of trying to make Postgres take over the
> entire machine by default. I'd want some fairly explicit permission
> from the user for that ...
Yes, those are decisions we are going to have to make, eventually. But recall
the three step process:
1. What values need changing?
2. What to change them to?
3. Could that be the new default value?
I haven't seen a proposal for item 1 yet, so the rest is idle discussion at
this time.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-06-06 15:55:21 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-06-06 15:36:47 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |