Re: Overhauling GUCS

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: 2008-06-06 15:16:50
Message-ID: 1669.1212765410@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> - If we know better values, why don't we set them by default?

The problem is: better for what? In particular, I'm uncomfortable with
any changes in the direction of trying to make Postgres take over the
entire machine by default. I'd want some fairly explicit permission
from the user for that ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-06-06 15:36:47 Re: Overhauling GUCS
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-06-06 15:12:56 Re: Overhauling GUCS