From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rémi Zara <remi_zara(at)mac(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen |
Date: | 2008-03-06 08:54:29 |
Message-ID: | 20080306085429.GB2033@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:38:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> >> I checked the Majordomo logs and there's nothing about those patches.
> >> I do see one message with the "Subject: pgsql: Clean up double negative,
> >> per Tom Lane." line. A message held for moderation shows up in the logs
> >> with a "stall" status. So these messages where chopped _before_ they
> >> got into Majordomo at all ...
> >>
> >> Perhaps a bug in the script that sends the email?
> >
> > I see a bunch of emails from you leaving the system today. My first
> > guess for problem location would be the antispam, but before we rule out
> > the sender completely - at exactly what time was the commit(s) that made
> > it through made, and at what time was the commit(s) that didn't make it
> > through? In GMT time, please :-)
>
> Huh, I have zero idea and I had already closed the windows. So, from
> the CVS logs:
This is enough - I just wanted to be sure which commits we talked about.
> revision 1.23
> date: 2008/03/05 19:42:11; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4
> Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara.
19:42:11 I have one email going out to pgsql-committers from alvherre.
21:14:10 I have another, that doesn't match any of these commits. Did you
make anotherone that you didn't include in this list?
> ...
> revision 1.12.4.1
> date: 2008/03/05 21:20:49; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +3 -4
> Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara.
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.16.4.1
> date: 2008/03/05 21:20:48; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +3 -4
> Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara.
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.17.2.1
> date: 2008/03/05 21:20:49; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +3 -4
> Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara.
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.19.2.1
> date: 2008/03/05 21:20:48; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +4 -5
> Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara.
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.22.2.1
> date: 2008/03/05 21:20:47; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +4 -5
> Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara.
21:20:47 I count 1.
21:20:48 I count 2.
21:20:49 I count 2.
All these mails have been acknowledged as received by svr1.postgresql.org.-
So the script that sends them out is working properly. I'm back at blaming
the antispam for eating them before they got out to the list. Especially
since you didn't get a boucne (I assume you would've noticed if you did)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-03-06 08:56:03 | Re: Problem with site doc search |
Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2008-03-06 07:50:35 | Re: Nasty bug in heap_page_prune |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-06 12:10:57 | Re: NetBSD/MIPS supports dlopen |
Previous Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2008-03-06 07:46:52 | Re: Sun Studio on Linux spinlock patch |